Minutes of the Academic Information Technology
CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, FRESNO5240 N. Jackson Avenue, M/S UC43
Fresno, California 93740-8023
Office of the Academic Senate
Ext. 8-2743
May 11, 2009
Members Present: O. Benavides (Chair), M. Bach, R. Boes, J. Cagle, D. Martin, K. Moffitt, E. Nelson, P. Newell, R. Parker, C. Won.
Absent: R. Amarasinghe, B. Auernheimer, L. Harding, D. Nef, L. Newlander, S. Seepersad.
Visitor: M. Mize.
The meeting was called to order by Chair O. Benavides at 1:10 p.m. in the Education Building room # 316.
- Minutes. MSC to approve the Minutes of 4/13/2009 & 4/27/2009.
- Agenda. MSC to approve the Agenda as amended:
Item #5 - (APM 206) Interim Policies and Procedures on Technology
Mediated Courses was deferred to Fall 2009. Election of new Chair
moved to item #4 and subsequent items renumbered accordingly. - Communications and Announcements.
Zimbra pilot going forward. Academic Information Technology (AIT)
members may ask J. Michael to join the pilot group. R. Boes mentioned
that the techs are considering accelerating the implementation of
Zimbra. - Chair of AIT Committee Election for 2009-2010.
MSC to elect O. Benavides Chair for 2009-2010. - Hardware and Software Reporting.
The key issues are privacy. One option is a no-cost option, but additional
administrative people would have access to information in the Active
Directory administrative tree. Other options would be costly—
approximately $20 per machine.
Various opinions were offered. One person thought that with clear policy
statements of purpose, limitations, logging, and procedures can satisfy
faculty and university concerns for the privacy and confidentiality of data
files. Another expressed the view that what software agents can be used
to gather the information on software in a more non-invasive manner.
R. Boes said that Active Directory can be scripted to limit access to data
files and discussed aspects related to logging, script modification, etc.
The capability of the Active Directory to read data files is one of the big
issues. There is a difference between a central audit and a software
controlled central audit.
One approach to addressing these issues would be to draft an
administrative access policy, defining by policy what an administrator
may legally do.
CSU Chancellor’s Office will issue the audit report (probably in May) and
then each campus will have six months to respond to the audit. - Academic Technology Advisory Committee (ATAC) Update.
Information Security Policy draft will be distributed soon. Three CSU
Academic Senate faculty representatives were on the nine member
committee. O. Benavides (who is a member of the committee) gave an
overview of the report. Additional information will be sent to the members
of the AIT Committee.
Acceptable Use Policy and the Standards Policy will also be issued in the
fall.
The Learning Management Futures Committee continues to meet.
Currently it is looking at what major university systems are doing with
LM systems and software. The group will then look at the CSU policies.
At Fresno State we will continue with a new 3-year system contract with
Blackboard. Moodle and Sakai pilot projects may and will continue.
MSC to adjourn at 2:30 p.m.
The next scheduled meeting of the Academic Information Technology
Committee (AIT) will be in Fall 2009 semester. Exact dates of meetings for Fall
2009 will be announced. An agenda will be sent out prior to the first meeting.
Appendix: Agenda item postponed to Fall 2009
(APM 206) Interim Policies and Procedures on Technology Mediated Courses.
[Postponed to Fall 2009]
This policy proposed revision was posted for review by the AIT Committee:
http://docs.google.com/Doc?id=dcw839r6_6c5zv8gg5&invite=kntj74
The committee discussed the scope of the policy. The documents currently
online at Google Docs are:
http://docs.google.com/Doc?id=dcw839r6_6c5zv8gg5
http://docs.google.com/Doc?id=dcw839r6_8tmbxhrck&hl=en
Discussion of (APM 206) Interim Policies and Procedures on Technology
Mediated Courses continued.
This PDF is provided as a print-only reference document and may not be fully accessible to users of assistive technology. For more information, please visit Title II Rule on Digital Accessibility page.