Minutes of the Graduate Committee

CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, FRESNO
5240 N. Jackson Avenue, M/S UC 43
Fresno, California 93740-8023
Office of the Academic Senate Ext. 8-2743

April 14, 2009

Members Present: T. Skeen (Chair), S. Brown-Welty, K. Carey, P. English,
G. Kriehn, N.P. Mahalik, Z. Wang, R. Yazdipour.

Members Absent: S. Skelton (excused).

Visitors: Michelle DenBeste (History Department)

The meeting was called to order by Chair Skeen at 2:05 p.m. in
University Center, Room #203.

  1. Minutes. MSC to approve the Minutes of 3/24/2009.
  2. Agenda. MSC to approve the Agenda as distributed.
  3. Communications and Announcements.
    1. Dean K. Carey stated the Research Symposium will be held
      on May 7, 2009 from 1-8:00 p.m. There are approximately
      60 proposals for presentations.
    2. Chair T. Skeen noted he has been invited to meet with the
      Executive Committee of the Senate regarding our letter
      related to (APM 322) Policy on the Assessment of Teaching
      Effectiveness.
  5. Sports Administration Option.
    MSC to approve the Sport Administration Option with the
    following recommendations:
    1. Develop a time line for implementation of the outcomes
      measurements in the SOAP,
    2. Consider including some courses from the MBA program as
      approved outside courses and that there be more
      specificity related to the courses that can be taken
      outside the program, and
    3. Add more internships if possible.
  6. History Certificate.
    The Chair complimented Dr. DenBeste on how well the proposal was
    written. Dr. DenBeste stated they are not requiring the GRE because
    it doesn’t seem reasonable for a 12 unit program – they are already
    teachers, working full-time. They will still need it to get their
    masters, and at that time they will need the GRE and meet the
    writing requirements.
    They want to offer the program because they have a collaborative
    grant program with Clovis Unified. Previously the participants did
    not get any credit for taking the classes, and it seemed prudent to
    give them some credit for the courses. This program is aimed at
    teachers who are teaching more history than they thought they
    would be teaching when they did their credential, and were probably
    not trained to teach history. Also, this program gives them access to
    upper level program content and courses.
    Dr. DenBeste stated she didn’t believe it would detract from their
    pool of Master’s degree students, because students who want to go
    on for the PhD. will still need their Masters degree. She emphasized
    this program is for teachers in the field who need more courses
    related to courses they actually teach. If students want to come into
    the Masters program after the certificate, they can only transfer 1
    course (3 units) into the master’s program.
    How are they measuring learning outcomes? They are using rubrics
    to grade papers turned in by the students. Not all outcomes will
    have rubrics, but each outcomes will be (should be) demonstrated in
    the final paper submitted by the student. Outcomes were written
    related to the material that was being covered in each course.
    Recommendation was made to reword some of the outcomes to
    reflect what the students were expected to be able to do as a result
    of the course. Dr. DenBeste stated she is willing to rewrite outcomes
    wherever it is needed.
    When there is no longer a grant (5 years) students will need to do
    local projects as opposed to going to Washington DC.
    MSC to approve the History certificate program with the
    following recommendation:
    Recommendation: Rewrite the learning outcomes to reflect what
    students are specifically expected to accomplish as a result of their
    course work.

MSC to adjourn at 2:45 p.m.

The next scheduled meeting of the Graduate Committee is Tuesday, April
28, 2009 at 2:00 p.m. in the University Center, Room #203.

Agenda.

  1. Approval of the Minutes of 4/14/09.
  2. Approval of the Agenda.
  3. Communication and Announcements.
  4. Juston Points’ Interdisciplinary Proposal (2:20 confirmed).

Download the PDF

This PDF is provided as a print-only reference document and may not be fully accessible to users of assistive technology. For more information, please visit Title II Rule on Digital Accessibility page.