Minutes of the Academic Information Technology Committee

CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, FRESNO
5240 N. Jackson Avenue, M/S UC43
Fresno, California 93740-8023
Office of the Academic Senate Ext. 8-2743

April 27, 2009

Members Present: O. Benavides (Chair)(via Skype from Vienna), R. Amarasinghe, R. Boes, J. Cagle, L. Harding, K. Moffitt, P. Newell, L. Newlander, E. Nelson, R. Parker.

Members Absent: B. Auernheimer, M. Bach, S. Seepersad, D. Martin, D. Nef, C. Won.

The meeting was called to order by John Cagle (acting Chair for Otto Benavides) at 1:10 p.m. in the Education Building room # 316.

  1. Minutes. Approval of the Minutes of April 13, 2009 was postponed.
  2. Agenda. MSC to approve the Agenda as distributed.
  3. Communications and Announcements.
    P. Newell asked about a Chancellor’s Office project involving hardware
    and software reporting. After brief discussion, the committee made it a
    new agenda item and began discussing it. A Skype connection was
    achieved between the committee and Chair O. Benavides, who was in
    Vienna at a conference. He participated in the rest of the meeting.
  4. Hardware and Software Reporting.
    A teleconference call was made to R. Boes.
    P. Newell summarized what he had heard and expressed his concern.
    The topic is a new Chancellor’s Office reporting system requiring campus
    hardware and software audits in October (to continue about six months
    until completed), an inventory of what we’re using. His concern was that
    in using Active Directory as a major tool, privacy and confidentiality of
    user’s records may be compromised and violated, among other things.
    R. Boes then commented. Among other things, he said that the good
    news is that Active Directory can give rights to survey software without
    “Administrative Rights.” The audit requires central readability using
    read-only. The reason for the audit has to do with concern about
    unlicensed software.
    After some discussion, J. Cagle suggested that a communication needs to
    be prepared and sent to the campus community: (1) explaining the
    purpose of the survey; (2) explain Active Directory as a tool, including its
    limitations; (3) explain the provisions to address individual privacy
    issues, such as real-time, read-only capability—reading only what
    Acknowledged link text: http://docs.google.com/Doc?id=dcw839r6_6c5zv8gg5&invite=kntj74
    software is installed, not individual files; (4) guidelines for handling data
    files to protect privacy and confidentiality of records during this process.
    Following this discussion, R. Boes suggested that he come to the next
    meeting to update the committee on the developing plan and that he will
    bring an Active Directory expert to discuss technical questions and
    issues as needed.
  5. (APM 206) Interim Policies and Procedures on Technology Mediated Courses.
    This policy proposed revision was posted for review by the AIT
    Committee:
    http://docs.google.com/Doc?id=dcw839r6_6c5zv8gg5&invite=kntj74
    The committee discussed the scope of the policy. The documents
    currently online at Google Docs are:
    http://docs.google.com/Doc?id=dcw839r6_6c5zv8gg5
    http://docs.google.com/Doc?id=dcw839r6_8tmbxhrck&hl=en
    Discussion of the interim policies and procedures document continued.
    L. Harding talked about the idea of a committee vs. a review panel. She
    suggested that a team could be created from a pool of trained faculty to
    perform the review and write the report. These reviews would be
    supported by the Digital Campus instructional designers—in the design
    of rubrics for evaluation, training, etc.
    The committee discussed several issues regarding the hybrid courses
    and the question of why the university doesn’t have more hybrid courses
    at this point. It was suggested that things could be done to encourage
    online course development, such as stipends to develop online courses.
    Issues (such as ownership of materials) were discussed.
    Work on the policy will continue at the next meeting. Suggestions can be
    sent to Cagle who will provide the committee with a draft for the next
    discussion, putting it on the Google Docs site.

MSC to adjourn 2:30 p.m.

The next scheduled meeting of the Academic Information Technology Committee (AIT) will be on Monday, May 11, 2009 at 1:00 p.m. in ED #319.

Agenda.

  1. Approval of the Minutes of 4/13/2009 and 4/26/2009.
  2. Approval of the Agenda.
  3. Communication and Announcements.
  4. Hardware and Software Reporting.
  5. (APM 206) Interim Policies and Procedures on Technology Mediated
    Courses.

Download the PDF

This PDF is provided as a print-only reference document and may not be fully accessible to users of assistive technology. For more information, please visit Title II Rule on Digital Accessibility page.