Division of Academic Affairs
Resources for Faculty
General Education: Policies and Procedures (APM 215, Revised Fall 2024)
GE ePortfolio Policy (Fall 2023)
GE Course Rubric (Spring 2026)
General Education Writing Requirements
- Courses must have a substantial iterative writing assignment.
- Lower division foundation courses for Area 1A require a minimum of 5000 words of formal writing across their major assignments, at least 4000 of which must be in revised final draft form.
- Lower division foundation courses for Area 1B require a minimum of 5000 words of writing.
- All other lower division GE courses require a 1000-word iterative assignment.
- Upper division GE Integration courses require a 2000 word iterative assignment.
Guidance from the GE Committee (approved March, 2026)
Courses must have a substantial iterative writing assignment. That is, there should be an opportunity for students to improve on their initial submission based on instructor feedback or on a subsequent submission (independent of the initial submission), if the grading criteria remain the same. Assignments may include a combination of process drafts, written peer response, and other forms of informal writing that informs students’ inquiry-driven research and writing process. One assignment by itself does not need to meet the word count, that is, for a 1000-word iterative assignment, two submissions of 500 words each will meet the overall 1000-word requirement. The first submission should provide a foundation for improvement on the second submission. Some examples of substantial iterative writing assignments are:
- A student may submit a writing assignment and receive instructor feedback, and submit the writing assignment again, showing incremental improvement. A timeline is suggested for when feedback will be provided after the draft submission.
- A student may submit a laboratory report for a given topic, receive instructor feedback, and submit another laboratory report on a separate topic. Despite the change in topic of the laboratory report, the grading criteria remains the same so students are familiar with areas for improvement based on the prior submission.
- A student may submit a discussion post, receive instructor (and peer) feedback, and improve upon their initial post and resubmit it. Informal discussion posts are unacceptable, as there needs to be substantial writing on which the instructor provides feedback. Courses with discussion posts as the iterative writing assignment need to make the substantive nature of the writing evident.
- A student may submit a presentation, but a detailed outline (full-sentence) of the presentation should be included. The outline should meet the writing requirement associated with the GE course. Feedback should be provided on the detailed outline.
GENERAL EDUCATION PROCEDURES
General Education (GE) course proposals are submitted through Modern Campus and should include the following:
- A title.
- A brief description (catalog entry).
- Any prerequisites (including those required by the GE Program).
- A justification of the course as meeting the goals, criteria, specifications and learning
outcomes
of GE as outlined in the Program Description document (Areas 1-6 as required), as well as the
applicable sections of Policies for Inclusion and Evaluation of General Education Courses
(detailed in the General Education Policies document). Integration courses require an explanation
of the manner in which the course integrates area and subarea goals and learning outcomes. - Frequency of course offering.
- Additional operating money required beyond present levels.
- Additional instructional equipment required.
- A course syllabus for each section taught that should include all required elements from the University syllabus templates.
- Specific writing or performance requirements that comply with GE Policies and the GE Writing Requirements document (e.g. typical paper assignments, research projects or performance requirements).
- A plan for assessing the student learning outcomes for the appropriate GE area, including the student work to be evaluated and the rubric or standardized method by which the work will be evaluated.
- The approval of the Departments involved, of the School or College curriculum committee(s), and of the School or College Dean(s).
General Education (GE) New Course proposals are submitted through Modern Campus via a New Course Form
- A request for a course to be added to the GE Program is made through the submission
of an Undergraduate GE Course Proposal form. Following a substantive review of the
request by the Department, appropriate School or College committee, and approval by
the School or College Dean, the request is submitted to the GE Committee through the
Provost or Provost’s designee. Proposals must be approved by the GE Committee as well
as the Provost or Provost’s designee. If approved, the course is incorporated into
the next year’s catalog, and it may be scheduled for offering during the academic
year covered by
the catalog. Existing courses for GE do not need to be submitted to the Undergraduate Curriculum Subcommittee. - If a course is interdisciplinary in nature, involving more than one School or College, the proposal must be approved by the respective committees and Deans of each school or College before submission to the GE Committee.
General Education (GE) Existing Course proposals are submitted through Modern Campus via a Course Revision Form
- Deletions or changes in existing courses involving unit value, lecture/laboratory
format, distance/mediated learning, prerequisites, class size, content, and title
or description are requested on the Undergraduate GE Course Change Request form. Following
a review by the Department, review and recommendation by the appropriate School or
College committee, and approval by the School or College Dean, the request is submitted
to the GE Committee through the Provost or Provost’s designee. If approved, the course
is incorporated into the next year’s catalog, and it may be scheduled for offering
during the
academic year covered by the catalog. - The procedures for submission of existing course proposals shall be the same as those described for new course proposals with the understanding that the depth of the review is contingent upon the extent of the proposed change.
- When a new course or a proposed change affects another program or Department, it must be cleared by the affected program or Department. Such clearance, as evidenced by the appropriate signatures on the request form, must be secured by the Department requesting the change. If clearance is denied, then resolution of the issues can be sought before the GE Committee. If a change significantly affects other courses or programs within the Department making the request, the necessary adjustments should also be indicated on the form. Information on current course interrelationships may be obtained from the Provost or Provost’s designee.
- The GE Committee will be responsible for recommending to the Provost or Provost’s designee amendments to the list of courses included in the GE Program.
- All courses in GE must be resubmitted and reapproved every five years during a review performed by the GE Committee to ensure the courses continue to meet the goals and learning outcomes of the program.
Governing Documents
- AB-928 Student Transfer Achievement Reform Act of 2021
- Academic Senate General Education Governance
- Cal-GETC Standards (1v2 2024)
- Executive Order 1100 (May 2024)
- Executive Order 1033 (May 2024)
- SB-1440 California Community Colleges: Student Transfer
Program Review
- Self Study Report
- On-Site Visit Team Report
- Response to Report
Useful Links
- The Office of IDEAS (Innovation and Digital Excellence for Academic Success)
- Office of Institutional Effectiveness
- Student Outcomes Assessment Program (SOAP)
For more detailed information of General Education and Learning Outcomes, please refer to APM 215 in the Academic Policy Manual. For any other questions please contact the Office of Undergraduate Studies.